2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E Owner Complaints

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with under-designed main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, power brakes, and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed components capable of meeting safety and normal usage requirements of Mach E owners.​ ​ My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA require that the Ford recall include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new appropriately specified parts.​ Failure examples: https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/😭😭😭-post-battery-contactor-recall-first-junction-box-failure-😭😭😭😭.19209/ and https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/post-recall-software-hvbjb-failure.19396/

7/7/2022

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.

7/10/2022

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang. The contact stated while pulling into a parking spot at approximately 2 MPH and had not yet placed the vehicle in park, the vehicle had an unintended acceleration. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The vehicle crashed into a light post, ran over the post, and crashed into a back of a building. The vehicle had damage to the hood, grill and bumper and also to the undercarriage. The contact said he had not suffered any injuries. The police were on the scene and filed a report. The contact had the vehicle towed to a collision repair shop. The vehicle had not been diagnosed by a dealer or independent mechanic. The vehicle had not been repaired. The contact researched online and related the failure to NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V333000 (Vehicle Speed Control, Power Train). The manufacturer had been informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,500.

9/1/2022

faulty high voltage battery junction box NHTSA Campaign Number: 22V412000

10/13/2022

2 times we have had an incident in which the vehicle at a slow speed when parking or switching between drive gear and reverse gear. The vehicle suddenly accelerates forward and the driver has to engage the brakes manually very firmly to prevent an accident.

5/20/2022

This incident occurred on July 15th 2022. The dealership, Koons Falls Church Ford, located in Falls Church VA, sold us a car with an active recall on it. About 3 days after the car leaving the lot, the service department contacted us about a recall notice that needed to be resolve via software update. This issue could lead to the entire car losing power while in motion, recall number 22V412000. This information WAS NOT disclosed to us at any time during the sales process, and we did not find out until later that evening when looking for accessories online. VIN: [XXX] INFORMATION Redacted PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

7/27/2022

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with under-designed main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, power brakes, and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed components capable of meeting safety and normal usage requirements of Mach E owners.​ ​ My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA require that the Ford recall include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new appropriately specified parts.​ Failure examples: https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/😭😭😭-post-battery-contactor-recall-first-junction-box-failure-😭😭😭😭.19209/ and https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/post-recall-software-hvbjb-failure.19396/

7/7/2022

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.

7/10/2022

Adaptive cruise control fault, pre-commission sensors not working, anti-lock break fault, restraint fault, tire pressure fault, dash turns off while driving which makes unable to see speed driving.

8/6/2022

Vehicle had an unintended acceleration resulting in crash in a parking lot.

8/17/2022

I was pulling into my garage, steering with my left hand, making a slow, tight left turn from the drive way into the perpendicular garage. As the steering wheel turned, I believe my left palm hit the cruise control button and activated the adaptive cruise control. The vehicle suddenly accelerated toward the house without warning. I slammed on the brakes in response, tossing my wife forward and then back into her seat. When I looked at the dash immediately following the stop, the cruise control image was displayed showing the range keeping bars. There were two conditions present that should have prevented the cruise control from accelerating. First, the tight turn of the wheels to the left should have prevented acceleration and two, the house directly in front of the adaptive sensors should have said "HEY! There's a big object right in front of me, we should probably stop, not speed up!" A GIF video from my surveillance camera is attached to this report showing the incident.

8/2/2022

I am randomly receiving the errors: "Front Camera Fault" "Pre-Collision Assist Not Available" Also, my cruise control no longer works while this error is active. Error will clear itself after a few minutes, but will still pop up from time to time.

1/13/2023

The High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) in ALL Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles has known defects with faulty main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22S41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes...and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can strand driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one. ​ My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22S41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are known to fail to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially stranding me in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the High Voltage Battery Junction Box (HVBJB) with a new one.

7/11/2022

THE BATTERY ENERGY CONTROL MODULE RECALL SOFTWARE UPDATE WAS COMPLETED ON MY VEHICLE ON SEPTEMBER 22ND 2022 AT 1203 PM AT GOSCH FORD OF HEMET. UPON LEAVING AROUND A MILE DOWN THE ROAD I WAS DRIVING AROUND A CORNER. WHILE IN THIS CORNER MULTIPLE THINGS HAPPENED AT THE SAME EXACT MOMENT. MY TRACTION LIGHT MOMENTARILY FLASHED ALONG WITH A SERVICE WRENCH. VEHICLE SKID PARTIALLY OFF-ROAD INTO THE DITCH. I LOST CONTROL FOR A BREIF MOMENT BUT WAS ABLE TO GAIN CONTROL BEFORE CRASHING. MY SPEED WAS DRASTICALLY REDUCED TO ABOUT 1/3 OF ITS NORMAL POWER. THE VEHICLE WOULD STILL DRIVE JUST MUCH SLOWER. UPON THIS HAPPENING I IMMEDIATELY TOOK MY VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP. THIS RECALL WAS VERY VAGUE. WHEN I WAS AT THE DEALERSHIP I INITIALLY ASKED THE FORD SERVICE SALESMAN DANIEL VENTURA IF THIS SOFTWARE CHANGED ANY ASPECT OF MY VEHICLES PERFORMANCE. HE THEN READ THE RECALL LETTER AND SAID IF IT DID IT NORMALLY WOULD SAY IT EITHER IN THE RECALL ITSELF OR THE LETTER FORD SENDS YOU THEY WOULD NORMALLYSAY IT IN IT. IT DID NOT MENTION THAT WHILE DRIVING THRU A CORNER IF YOU LOOSE POWER IN THE CAR DUE TO A BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE THAT YOU MAY LOOSE TRACTION AND LOOSE CONTROL OF THE CAR MOMENTARILY. THIS IS A VERY UNSAFE DRIVING CONDITION. FURTHERMORE WHEN I LEFT THE DEALERSHIP THE CAR DROVE DIFFERENTLY. IT SEEMED LIKE THE HORSE POWER WAS ABOUT 5-10 HP LESS THEN WHEN PURCHASED. IT FELT A LITTLE WEIRD TO GET USED TO DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD SINCE IT HAD A LITTLE BIT MORE PUSH THEN BEFORE. I MENTION THIS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT AS A CONSUMER I HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE SOFTWARE THAT IS GOING INTO MY CAR. IF ANY ADVERSE REACTION THAT MAY CAUSE ME A DIFFERENT DRIVING EXPERIENCE OR PUT MY LIFE AT RISK OF CRASHING SHOULD HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SAFETY RECALL OR THE LETTER FORD HAD SENT US IN THE RECALL. I AM A FIRM BELIEVER THEY DO NOT WANT TO TELL US THAT THIS VEHICLE IS STILL NOT SAFE TO DRIVE AS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME HAVING THE BATTERY CONTROL MODULE FAILURE DURING CORNERING.

9/23/2022

Brakes automatically engage when parked. Next time I went to drive the car wouldn't move until a loud "clunk" came from the rear and the car moved. But, when I started driving there was a repetitive noise coming with each turn of a rear wheel. Parked the car and took to dealership which confirmed that a "chunk" of the brake pad had come off and adhered to the brake rotor. Contacted Ford and was told that it wasn't covered under warranty because I had gone more than 12, 000 miles. They did set up a case (CAS-46526025-Q7S5V2), but I never heard anything from it. In conversation with the dealer, this is apparently a common problem for which Ford has issued at least 2 TSBs (21-2206 & 22-2023) but the term expired before my incident. From reading of other incidents on various forums for the MachE, it is apparent that the problem still persists as in my case and is affecting a number of owners. Ford needs to be pressured into issuing a recall to install improved brake pads/rotors to prevent this problem from occurring. It could happen at a time when it isn't easy to pull over and therefore, cause an accident.

12/19/2023

I just had a similar experience about four hours ago during normal conditions (dry and daylight). I was approaching a red light that controlled an on/off ramp intersection where a rural road intersects a state Highway. I was on the rural road. As I started braking, the pedal almost immediately felt soft. I kept pressing (never pumped) the brake pedal steadily lexpecting to feel more normal resistance. The brake pedal traveled more than double the distance that it normally does. I started to get some braking, but I don’t think I could have locked up the brakes if I wanted to. The emergency braking didn’t engage; however, there wasn’t a car traveling in my lane between me and the intersection. There were cars exiting the freeway and turning through the intersection immediately in front of me. Fortunately, I had enough brakes to stop just before the intersection. I had my wife and son in the car. I will be having the local Ford dealership look over the car. That incident happened 5-10 minutes after leaving my house. I had used my brakes during this trip prior to the incident. The brakes worked normally for the remainder of the 20 minute trip. Whatever is going on, isn’t right and although I never was dangerously close to an accident, if conditions were slightly different it could have been very bad.

3/15/2024

The HVBJB subassembly in ALL Ford Mach-e vehicles has known defects with 'under-designed' main contactors that are known to fail under normal charging and driving conditions as outlined in current open Ford recall notice for my vehicle 22s41. Unfortunately, the internal damage to contactors is not visible externally, and warning notices on display only after damage has occurred, and can result in sudden loss of propulsion power at highway speed, loss of power steering, and power brakes... and failure of other 12v systems due to failure to charge the 12v battery properly after contactors are damaged. Less catastrophic results can include failure to start; which can 'strand' driver's and passengers in remote areas, bad weather conditions, as well as cause loss of use for weeks due to delays in replacement parts and local Dealerships needing equipment and training to effect removal/replacement of faulty unit with a new HVBJB having re-designed 'beefier' components. My complaint is that Ford's recall notice 22s41 is a software-only attempt to prevent future damage, and does not require removal of the part(s) which are KNOWN TO FAIL to be replaced with the re-designed components which are available, and have been used to repair failures under warranty. I have no way of inspecting the original equipment to evaluate current condition; and failure can result in sudden and unexpected loss of power, steering, and braking as well as potentially 'stranding me' in unsafe conditions unable to re-start my vehicle.​ ​ I would like to see NHTSA strengthen the Ford recall to include both improved software AND removal/replacement of the HVBJB sub-assembly with the new 'beefier' parts.

7/10/2022

Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.

10/17/2022

Power steering went out including 10+ error / fault codes displaying on the dash on the vehicle after planned having vehicle towed but was back to normal after a restart. Exiting the parking lot at a low speed power steering failed again resulting in a low speed crash. After having it towed to dealership they reviewed software on the vehicle seeing vehicle has has fault codes and module errors for 3+ months on their Ford telemetries cloud system showing module and system errors every other day. Dealership asked if I ever got notice via vehicle or app about these errors which I never received. Ford Legal was notified and said vehicle did have a possible Bluecruise recall and nothing wrong with vehicle without having a Ford Engineer viewing the vehicle. My dealership still said cloud system showed all these errors which didn't seem be an issue to ford. My insurance said they'd make repairs but if my dealership said vehicle isn't safe they recommenced fix what is needed which Ford said 0 issues.

10/17/2022

Ford is aware of these issues and I can't believe they are ignoring them and making me pray through them. My vehicle, since I purchased it, has had issues with the adaptive cruise, the accident avoidance gets disabled, lane assist stops working, and the final thing is that it registers that the camera is not working and must be serviced. the last thing that happened is that the car shut down its self driving in the middle of taking a turn on the highway and proceeded to drive me off the road. There was no braking or anything, when I reacted to stop it, I barely missed the guard rail and the car fought me to even turn the wheel. This has been documented with multiple dealerships. All of them have dealt with Ford's technicians remotely and have all failed at fixing my issues. Before it everything stopped working again, it went on and off for months as it did before... the failed completely. Because of this, my wife and I only transport our children in her vehicle out of concerns for our family's safety. Ford will try to say they won't replace my vehicle due to its current milage, but this was well documented and never fixed long before this. its been happening since 2,000 miles.

12/11/2023

I am randomly receiving the errors: "Front Camera Fault" "Pre-Collision Assist Not Available" Also, my cruise control no longer works while this error is active. Error will clear itself after a few minutes, but will still pop up from time to time.

1/13/2023

Multiple safety features rendered INOPERABLE AND USELESS including front collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane keeping system because FORD uses an inferior product to connect the vehicle's cameras and sensors. Each of the systems listed "front collision warning, automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane keeping system" are now DISABLED and they are integral to preventing collisions. The vehicle is marketed with those features and is presumably justification of the MSRP charged to customers. FORD is apparently aware of the issue based on FORD forums, that replacement of windshield can comprise the coax cable. The company is using an outdated and less reliable coax cable to run sensors and cameras for an Electric Vehicle when a much more viable, pliable and reliable Fiber media has been available for over 20 years is shortsighted and cheap. Coax to run safety features also brings into question how that feature was safety tested. The vehicle was diagnosed by a Ford Dealership in PA, "U2107" code indicating an issue with the coax cable used to connect the sensors and camera. No component been inspected by the manufacturer, police, insurance representatives or others. Even though there were warning messages it is UNKOWN when the issue actually started or know exactly when the systems failed. I am sure FORD can check the messages store in the software.

8/12/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mach-E. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 60 MPH the steering and braking systems suddenly malfunctioned causing the driver to lose control of the vehicle. The driver was unable to steer the vehicle and when pressing the brake pedal the vehicle did not stop. The driver lost control of the vehicle drove off the road and down a ravine and crashed into a concrete embankment. During the crash neither front air bags deployed. The front passenger sustained a fractured sternum and was transported from the scene to the hospital. The driver of the vehicle sustained a concussion which later required medical attention. A police report was taken at the scene and the vehicle was towed away. The cause of the failures was not yet determined. The manufacturer and local dealer were notified of the failure. The contact indicated that the vehicle was recently serviced for NHTSA Campaign number: 23V687000(Electrical System). The failure mileage was 9,100.

1/4/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E. The contact stated that while driving approximately 20 MPH and pressing the brake pedal to stop, the vehicle suddenly accelerated forward and crashed into the rear of a second vehicle. Before the crash, the pre-collision warning had activated, but the vehicle did not stop. The front end of the had sustained severe damage but no bags deployed. No injuries were reported. A police report was taken at the scene, and the vehicle was later towed to a nearby collision facility. The cause of the failures has not yet been determined. The manufacturer and local dealer have not yet been contacted. The failure mileage was 19,100.

4/28/2025

While driving a warning message in red was displayed on the driver display indicating that the frunk(front trunk) hood was open and that the emergency frunk release had been activated. I pulled over and stopped and got out and closed the frunk hood. I continued driving and upon braking, the messages appeared again. This time I opened the hood and discovered that a folded hard-sided bag that was in the frunk had slid up against the emergency release button with enough force to trigger the emergency release.

9/8/2022

Glass roof was cracked in December by what looked like a shell dropped on the top. Had it repaired by insurance on January 16, 2025. Less than two months later, there is another crack that appeared out of no where. Was not at work that week and the car was parked in my garage. I never felt any impact of any kind. Sent pics to insurance (sunroof express) and they are refusing to cover it under warranty.

4/9/2025

Nothing has failed, but I've determined the Suspension in all Ford Mustang Mach-Es from 2021-2023, excluding the Mach-E GT Performance is flawed. At first I thought it was just unengineered and terrible, but i've come to the conclusion that it's possibly dangerous. Driving yesterday on a city street and the road had a slight transition from left to right and at that very place , the road also has a bit of a bump, i hit that during the slight transition to the right and the car bounced up and the rear end almost stepped out, putting the car sideways (It did not, but slightly faster or more of an angle change, it's very possible it would have). Again as I stated before, the suspension is underdamped for the weight of the vehicle and it's quite easy for it to get unsettled, heck even just coming out of a parking lot it can get unsettled. I'm afraid someone is going to find this out the hard way and someone is going to get hurt. I'd say this is akin to loading a 1/2 ton truck with 1 ton of cargo, it is illegal and really this suspension trying to handle the battery weight, plus the car and passengers, it's just not up to the task. As a Ford shareholder, it's not that I'd like to see Ford hurt. I'd like to see them fix this issue and actually engineer a safe suspension,a capable suspension for a vehicle that almost weighs 5K lbs.

4/18/2023

The stock suspension is dangerously defective. Both front and rear suspension do zero dampening and rebound necessary to keep the vehicle tires in contact with the road. When driving 50 to 70miles an hour on the highway, whenever I encountered a regular dip on an overpass, the front and rear wheels go slightly airborne. On several occasions driving on I-69 in Houston area, at one of the curved overpasses near Hilcroft Rd, slightly rainy wet and slick highway road, at 55 mph, my Mach E went airborne for a split second after passing thru one of the normal dips or seams on the concrete highways. I felt the vehicle was out of control going airborne for a split second and then regaining control after the up and down bounce subsided. I complained to my dealer (Helfman Ford). Their response was... they couldn't do much about the suspension because there were no recalls nor TSBs. However, they were able to log the complaint directly to Ford. I don't know the exact date of occurence, but one of the instances was sometime in the month of April 2023.

8/14/2023

While driving on the freeway at about 65 mph through a gradual left bend in the road, with fully active SuperCruise (lane keeping, active cruise control) and fully hands off, the vehicle suddenly veered into the adjacent right lane. The vehicle moved into the adjacent lane at a high rate, and could have resulted in a heavy side impact to a vehicle driving in that lane (and potentially rippling into the lane to the right of that as well). Throughout the deviation, SuperCruise remained active without warning lamps or any inducement of driver takeover. I caught the malfunction and manually overpowered the steering to bring the vehicle back into the original driving lane. The vehicle has no active open recalls, and is operating with the latest firmware updates installed. The vehicle has not been inspected by dealer, manufacturer, or any other group for any relating issues.

9/1/2023

While driving on I-40 East between Raleigh, NC and Benson, NC I was trying to use the Blue Cruise self driving feature on my Mache. The system is frightening to me because it tends to default towards the marker between lanes and requires more attention than so called hands free driving is supposed to need. However, in this situation, there was a stretch of the highway where the lane markers were half white and then half black stripes. When I hit that stretch the car veered over the lane markers into the passing lane and if I hadn't resumed control, would have taken me completely into the other lane. The dash indicated that the system was in control of the car for the entire time. It had not disengaged at any point.

9/18/2023

Ford did an update recently, 6.8.0, which obscures the speedometer and moved it to far right of the IPC making it difficult to see now when driving. This is safety issue and I like to have the speed of my vehicle right in front me where it should be.

12/20/2023

There is an issue with the vehicle displaying the speed when operating. I have experienced this issue randomly over the past year. The speed is typically displayed on the information cluster screen above the steering wheel. I have photo and video of the issue but the Upload File button is not working on your website. The only resolution so far has been to restart the vehicle. It does not appear that this can be resolved while the vehicle is ON.

1/2/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that, upon starting the vehicle, the screen above the steering wheel was producing errors. The door open and trunk open messages were displayed. The brake pedal was pumping without being depressed. The main screen was frozen and not operational. The driver turned off the vehicle, but upon restarting, the vehicle failed to shift into gear. The contact called the local dealer, who informed her about the access panel on the front bumper. The contact exited the vehicle and closed the driver's side front door; after opening the access panel, the contact attempted to jumpstart the vehicle, but the vehicle failed to start. The contact stated that the doors locked with her son and two dogs inside the vehicle. The window was down approximately three inches. The contact's child was inside the vehicle but was unable to unlock the doors from inside the vehicle due to the 12-volt battery being drained. The contact stated that the hood failed to open. The manufacturer was contacted, and referred the contact of Ford SYNC and informed the contact that the vehicle was flagged, and the 12-volt battery was low, and an update was needed, and directed her to Roadside Assistance. The contact called Roadside Assistance, who was unable to jump the vehicle with several jumping devices. The contact used a portable battery to access the vehicle. The vehicle began making an abnormal knocking noise and jerking. The Fire Department was on the scene and was able to assist. The contact pulled down the rear window, knocked the window off track, and was able to get into the vehicle. The contact was able to climb through the window, pump the brake pedal, open the door, open the hood, jumpstart, and charge the vehicle. The contact was able to drive the vehicle. The manufacturer was contacted again and opened a case. The contact provided feedback and was referred to the local dealer and to the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was approximately 19,995.

3/14/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated while operating the vehicle, the messages "Passenger’s door ajar" and "Driver’s door ajar" were displayed along with the message "Stop Safely" before the vehicle suddenly turned off. The vehicle could not be restarted and was later towed to the local dealer. The dealer diagnosed that the 12-volt Lithium Ion Battery was faulty and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not yet repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 55,000.

10/9/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that the rear driver's side door and passenger's side doors failed to open intermittently. The vehicle was taken to an unknown dealer, where the failure could not be duplicated. The contact later became aware that the VIN was included in NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages), which the contact related to the failure; however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and advised the contact that the VIN was not included in the recall; however, the VIN tool confirmed that the VIN was included in the recall. The manufacturer referred the contact to the NHTSA Hotline for assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 25,000. VIN tool confirms parts not available.

7/1/2025

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V404000 (Electrical System, Latches/Locks/Linkages); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact stated that while attempting to exit the vehicle, the doors automatically locked independently. The contact called AAA o assist with unlocking the vehicle to be able to exit the vehicle. The dealer was contacted and confirmed that there was no fix yet available. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and sent AAA to assist the contact. The failure mileage was unknown. VIN tool confirms parts not available.

7/22/2025

Upon startup and without warning, the sound system emitted a very startling ear-piercing noise followed by very loud static which did not stop when radio was turned off. It finally stopped when I turned the car off but static started up again each time it was turned on. An hour later when the car was turned on it did not occur. It was so loud that the car was undrivable not to mention how startling it was at the onset. I actually jumped out of the car when it happened. I’ve scheduled a service visit for next week.

8/24/2023

On this vehicle, it looks like I may have some arcing on the pins on my car where the charging port hooks up. This car has burnt up two charging cables. What I would like Nhsta to ask Ford is nowhere in this customer satisfaction program does it say they will replace the burnt pins on anyone's cars if they have them. Also, I do not see any recall for this issue as every single mach e that has any chance of having burning pins in their charging port should be inspected. I have received this letter on my 2022 mach e and 2023 one and I will make a complaint for both. There should not only be a recall opened up on this to properly inspect every single charging port for any kind of arching as any kind of arching may have caused damage not only to the pins but the entire electrical system or any one of the components that go from the pins to the batteries. Furthermore of a recall I also ask that an investigation be opened to Ford itself since they cannot tell customers who pay a ton of money for there vehicles why they did not open a recall or notify Nhsta in the first place. This is even worse in my opinion then the last two recalls when they tried to give us software knowingly having an updated part that was more robust for the battery control module to have to be investigated in order to replace it. This should not be tolerated. My safety, my family's safety, and everyone else's safety who owns one of these vehicles is the main importance to me. Like I said looks like I may have some arching on my pins on my car charging port but who would know Ford is not even going to replace them or inspect them there is no recall for this that I have seen. Shady as usual shame on you Ford I hope NHSTA drops the hammer on you this time and the last time.

11/6/2023

The panoramic glass roof is slowly failing. The glass began to develop a small stress crack (with no sign or notice of impact as cause) which, over the months, has grown to a complete circle, about 12 inches in lengths. Additional stress cracks will easily compromise the glass and cause an immediate road safety hazard. Ford dealership denies any responsibility or warranty claim, falsely claiming it was due to some kind of impact when it was not.

11/28/2023

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that, upon starting the vehicle, the screen above the steering wheel was producing errors. The door open and trunk open messages were displayed. The brake pedal was pumping without being depressed. The main screen was frozen and not operational. The driver turned off the vehicle, but upon restarting, the vehicle failed to shift into gear. The contact called the local dealer, who informed her about the access panel on the front bumper. The contact exited the vehicle and closed the driver's side front door; after opening the access panel, the contact attempted to jumpstart the vehicle, but the vehicle failed to start. The contact stated that the doors locked with her son and two dogs inside the vehicle. The window was down approximately three inches. The contact's child was inside the vehicle but was unable to unlock the doors from inside the vehicle due to the 12-volt battery being drained. The contact stated that the hood failed to open. The manufacturer was contacted, and referred the contact of Ford SYNC and informed the contact that the vehicle was flagged, and the 12-volt battery was low, and an update was needed, and directed her to Roadside Assistance. The contact called Roadside Assistance, who was unable to jump the vehicle with several jumping devices. The contact used a portable battery to access the vehicle. The vehicle began making an abnormal knocking noise and jerking. The Fire Department was on the scene and was able to assist. The contact pulled down the rear window, knocked the window off track, and was able to get into the vehicle. The contact was able to climb through the window, pump the brake pedal, open the door, open the hood, jumpstart, and charge the vehicle. The contact was able to drive the vehicle. The manufacturer was contacted again and opened a case. The contact provided feedback and was referred to the local dealer and to the NHTSA Hotline. The failure mileage was approximately 19,995.

3/14/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated while reversing(R) at approximately 2 MPH, the back-up camera image froze and then went black. The contact stated that the "Parking Assist" warning light illuminated and then a random game launched on the screen. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer who was unable to duplicate the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not informed of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 16,000.

4/11/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while having the Blue Cruise system activated at approximately 70 MPH, the vehicle suddenly drifted to the right. The contact was able to straighten out the vehicle however, the vehicle drifted to the left and then to the right again. After a while, the contact was able to regain control of the vehicle by manually operating the steering wheel instead of using the Blue Cruise system to control the vehicle. The contact stated that shortly after regaining control of the vehicle, the failure recurred in the opposite direction going from left to right, and then to the left. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact was able to maintain control. The dealer was contacted and was able to remotely pull the codes from the vehicle for diagnostic testing. The dealer diagnosed that the camera system and control modules had failed. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The manufacturer referred the contact to the dealer for servicing. The failure mileage was 30,000.

4/29/2024

The contact owns a 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E. The contact stated that while having the Blue Cruise system activated at approximately 70 MPH, the vehicle suddenly drifted to the right. The contact was able to straighten out the vehicle however, the vehicle drifted to the left and then to the right again. After a while, the contact was able to regain control of the vehicle by manually operating the steering wheel instead of using the Blue Cruise system to control the vehicle. The contact stated that shortly after regaining control of the vehicle, the failure recurred in the opposite direction going from left to right, and then to the left. There were no warning lights illuminated. The contact was able to maintain control. The dealer was contacted and was able to remotely pull the codes from the vehicle for diagnostic testing. The dealer diagnosed that the camera system and control modules had failed. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The manufacturer referred the contact to the dealer for servicing. The failure mileage was 30,000.

4/29/2024