CARFOCALvehicle research
Research CarsCompareRankingsArticles
  1. Home›
  2. Manufacturers›
  3. Buick›
  4. Enclave›
  5. 2011›
  6. Complaints

2011 Buick Enclave Owner Complaints

Updated May 30, 20264 Critical Recalls
Ethan Miller
2011 Buick Enclave Owner Complaints

Complaint Summary

The 2011 Buick Enclave has 283 reported complaints.

  • Top issues involve steering and air bags.

Reliability Score

Reliability Score

6.3/ 10

Based on 283 complaints

Most Frequent Issues

STEERING

41 14.5%

AIR BAGS

38 13.4%

ENGINE

33 11.7%

POWER TRAIN

32 11.3%

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

21 7.4%

Quick Insights

  • The top category is STEERING, accounting for 14.5% of all complaints.

  • Owners have reported issues across 33 distinct vehicle systems.

  • Note: Complaint data reflects owner reports and may not always indicate a verified defect. Compare with Recalls and TSBs for a complete picture.

Subscribe to Recall Alerts

Get notified when a new recall or important ownership update lands for the 2011 Buick Enclave.

Free alerts based on U.S. recall data. Unsubscribe anytime.

Complaint Summary

What owners keep reporting on the 2011 Buick Enclave

The 2011 Buick Enclave has 283 owner complaints in this dataset. STEERING is the most common complaint category, representing about 14% of the reports shown here.

Most common complaint categories

The top complaint groups for the 2011 Buick Enclave are STEERING (41), AIR BAGS (38), ENGINE (33).

Are these complaints a serious red flag?

Potentially. 160 complaint reports involve higher-attention systems like brakes, steering, engine, powertrain, fuel, suspension, airbags, or electrical components, which is enough to justify a focused inspection.

What should buyers inspect on a used 2011 Buick Enclave?

Start with the top complaint systems, compare them against the recall report, then inspect service records for evidence that those same areas were already repaired or monitored.

Read the full buyer guideRecall report and remedy notesMaintenance costs and intervals2012 Enclave complaints2013 Enclave complaints2014 Enclave complaints

Detailed Complaint Log

Showing 33 of 33 systems

STEERING

39 Reports16% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

DRIVING OFF OF A HIGHWAY. SUDDEN ENGINE SEIZE STEERING LOCK AND ZERO POWER. CAR ROLLED TO A COMPLETE STOP. LUCKILY WE WERE IN A TURNING LANE AND WERE ABLE TO ROLL INTO A SAFE WAITING AREA. NO ONE IN THE VEHICLE WERE INJURED BODILY YET THE MENTAL ANGUISH AND FEAR WAS UNBEARABLE. HAD THIS HAPPENED ON THE HIGHWAY FIVE MINUTES EARLIER , WITH THE HEAVY TRAFFIC, I AM SURE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE SERIOUS OUTCOME. THE CAR HAS SINCE BEEN SERVICED. REPLACED WERE A BROKEN ENGINE BELT., AND BAD TENSIONER. WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS HOW A 3 YEAR OLD CAR COULD FAIL SO TERRIBLY. I AM NOW PETRIFIED TO DRIVE MY ENCLAVE FOR FEAR OF OTHER FAULTY PARTS. SERVICE WAS PERFORMED AT FERMAN GMC ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013 IN LUTZ FLORIDA. THIS WAS THEIR FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH SUCH A PROBLEM. VERY SCARY EXPERIENCE FOR ALL INVOLVED. EVERY TIME I SEE A BUCK I RECALL THAT NIGHT IN MY MIND. I STILL HAVE NOT DRIVEN THE CAR SINCE IT HAS BEEN REPAIRED AND HOME. NOT SURE I CAN EVER TRUST THIS BRAND AGAIN. I WAS TOLD A FAULTY TENSIONER CAUSED THE ENGINE BELT TO SNAP. HORRIBLE. *TR

11/13/2013

REPORTED ISSUE TO DEALER OF CAR MAKING WHINING NOISE AT LOW SPEEDS. DEALER SAYS I NEED A NEW POWER STEERING RACK, HOSES AND POSSIBLY A NEW PUMP! THE CAR IS A IS ONLY A 2011 AND VERY WELL MAINTAINED! SPOKE WITH GM - THEY CONTACTED DEALER WONDERING WHY NO RECALL SINCE EVERY SINGLE FORUM I READ HAS HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT THIS SAME EXACT ISSUE. I WAS FURIOUS THAT THEY REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AS A PROBLEM. THEY SAY THAT THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH POWER STEERING NOISE PROBLEMS REPORTED TO REQUIRE THEM TO ISSUE A RECALL. THEY SAY THAT THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS DECISION. IT IS A FEDERAL SAFETY ISSUE AND THAT THEY ISSUE RECALLS BASED ON NUMBERS, HOWEVER, THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED OFTEN ENOUGH TO ISSUE A RECALL. THEY ARE OFFERING ME A "DEAL" TO GET THE CAR FIXED AT MY DEALER. THEY WILL PAY ALL BUT $500 TOWARD THE RACK AND LABOR. I NEED TO COVER THE HOSES AND POSSIBLY THE PUMP IF IT IS BAD. ALSO, IF THERE IS A RECALL IN THE FUTURE I WILL BE REIMBURSED RETROACTIVELY FOR MY EXPENSES. ISN'T THIS AN ADMISSION THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM??? I AM SO ANGRY! MY DEALER, HOWEVER SINGS A DIFFERENT TUNE FROM GM. SAYS THAT THIS PROBLEM EXISTS QUITE FREQUENTLY IN THE ENCLAVE, ACADIA AND THE CHEVY TRAVERSE...... I AM NOT SURE THAT I BELIEVE OR TRUST ANYTHING THEY HAVE TO SAY! I HAVE A 2011 ENCLAVE (WHICH I ABSOLUTELY LOVED UP UNTIL NOW!) WITH 60K ON IT. NOW OUT OF WARRANTY - EVENTUALLY THIS WILL HAVE TO BE FIXED - LEAVING A VERY LARGE DENT IN MY POCKET AND A HOLE IN MY HEART BECAUSE I REALLY THOUGHT I WOULD HAVE THIS CAR FOR A LONG TIME. HOWEVER, ONCE IT IS PAID OFF I AM DUMPING IT. NO MORE BUICKS OR GM CARS FOR ME. NOT EVER! I REALLY WISH THAT SOMEONE WOULD BEGIN INVESTIGATING GM AND THIS ISSUE. IT IS A HUGE SAFETY CONCERN, NOT TO MENTION A VERY EXPENSIVE FIX. PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS AND LET ME KNOW WHAT CONCERNED FOLKS SUCH AS MYSELF CAN DO TO DEAL WITH THIS! THANK YOU!!!!! *TR

2/23/2014

37 more complaints are available in this category.

AIR BAGS

35 Reports14% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

AIR BAG LIGHT KEPT COMING ON. LOVE BUICK, COLUMBIA SC REPLACED MODULE. SEVERAL DAYS LATER AIR BAG LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN WITH A MESSAGE " SERVICE AIRBAG ". ABOVE DEALER NOW HAS THIS VEHICLE IN SERVICE AND SAYS THEY NEED TO KEEP IT SEVERAL DAYS FOR MORE DIAGNOSTICS. *TR

12/7/2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. WHILE PARKED, THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE FAILURE RECURRED INTERMITTENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTICS WHERE THE TECHNICIAN ADVISED THAT THE FAILURE COULD HAVE OCCURRED BECAUSE A CELL PHONE WAS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE SEAT. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,000.

3/22/2012

33 more complaints are available in this category.

ENGINE

28 Reports11% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

DRIVING OFF OF A HIGHWAY. SUDDEN ENGINE SEIZE STEERING LOCK AND ZERO POWER. CAR ROLLED TO A COMPLETE STOP. LUCKILY WE WERE IN A TURNING LANE AND WERE ABLE TO ROLL INTO A SAFE WAITING AREA. NO ONE IN THE VEHICLE WERE INJURED BODILY YET THE MENTAL ANGUISH AND FEAR WAS UNBEARABLE. HAD THIS HAPPENED ON THE HIGHWAY FIVE MINUTES EARLIER , WITH THE HEAVY TRAFFIC, I AM SURE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE SERIOUS OUTCOME. THE CAR HAS SINCE BEEN SERVICED. REPLACED WERE A BROKEN ENGINE BELT., AND BAD TENSIONER. WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS HOW A 3 YEAR OLD CAR COULD FAIL SO TERRIBLY. I AM NOW PETRIFIED TO DRIVE MY ENCLAVE FOR FEAR OF OTHER FAULTY PARTS. SERVICE WAS PERFORMED AT FERMAN GMC ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013 IN LUTZ FLORIDA. THIS WAS THEIR FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH SUCH A PROBLEM. VERY SCARY EXPERIENCE FOR ALL INVOLVED. EVERY TIME I SEE A BUCK I RECALL THAT NIGHT IN MY MIND. I STILL HAVE NOT DRIVEN THE CAR SINCE IT HAS BEEN REPAIRED AND HOME. NOT SURE I CAN EVER TRUST THIS BRAND AGAIN. I WAS TOLD A FAULTY TENSIONER CAUSED THE ENGINE BELT TO SNAP. HORRIBLE. *TR

11/13/2013

WATER PUMP FAILED, CAR OVERHEATED. STRANDED WIFE AND DAUGHTER 2 HOURS. PART FIXED UNDER RECALL GM CAMPAIGN 13079. NEVER NOTIFIED OF RECALL PRIOR TO INCIDENT. *TR

11/21/2013

26 more complaints are available in this category.

POWER TRAIN

25 Reports10% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

THE VEHICLE ROLLS BACK ON ANY INCLINE. THERE IS NO HAND BRAKE IN THE CENTER CONSOLE, AND ACCORDING TO DOT SAFETY THIS IS NOT LEGAL. MOST CROSSOVERS AND OR SUVS OF THIS SIZE ROLL BACK A FEW INCHES BEFORE THE TRANSMISSION PINS ENGAGE AND STOP THE ROLL BACK. I WAS TOLD FROM GMC THAT THE COMPONENT WAS REMOVE SO THAT THE TRANSMISSION DOESN'T HAVE TO BE SERVICED FOR 100000 MILES. GMC TOLD US THE ONLY THING THEY ARE WILLING TO DO IS INSTALL AND AFTER-MARKET HAND CONTROL AND WILL PAY A PERCENTAGE TOWARD THE COST. TO ME THIS SOUNDS LIKE A BAND-AID FIX TO A BIGGER PROBLEM.

4/27/2011

BUICK ENCLAVE 2011: THE CAR ROLLS DOWN UNCONTROLLABLY ON HILLS WHILE IN GEAR WHETHER IN DRIVE OR REVERSE, AND IS VERY HARD TO CONTROL. THIS ALSO REQUIRES VERY QUICK MOVEMENT FROM BRAKE TO ACCELERATOR. THERE IS NO "HILL HOLD" FEATURE AND DRIVETRAIN PROVIDES NO RESISTANCE. WE DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM EVERY DAY WHILE DRIVING OUR DRIVEWAY AND INTO OUR GARAGE. THE MINUTE WE ATTEMPT TO PULL UP TO THE GARAGE, THE CAR/SUV STARTS ROLLING BACKWARDS AND YOU HAVE TO CONDUCT A COUPLE OF QUICK STEPS TO STOP IT. I IMAGINE THIS CAUSES WEAR AND TEAR ON THE BRAKES AND OTHER PARTS OF THE VEHICLE. A SERVICE REP AT THE DEALERSHIP SAID THIS WAS NORMAL AND TOLD ME ABOUT OTHER MANUFACTURERS THAT HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM FROM GMC. I DRIVE A SECOND CAR AND IT NEVER DOES THIS. I BELIEVE THIS IS A BUICK ENCLAVE PROBLEM. *TR

9/21/2011

23 more complaints are available in this category.

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

18 Reports7% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

PASSENGER SIDE FRONT WINDOW AND DOOR DEFECTIVE; SPORADIC AND RECURRENT NON-FUNCTION; DEALERSHIP WILL NOT REPAIR BECAUSE THEY CANNOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. SAFETY ISSUE; AS DRIVING AND UNABLE TO REACH PASSENGER SIDE, NOTICED DOOR UNLOCKED. DEALERSHIP SAID WOULD COST 800-900 DOLLARS TO REPLACE ELECTRICAL HARNESS AND WILL NOT REPLACE. *TR

4/6/2012

OUR BUICK ENCLAVE 2011 HAD JUST STARTED DOWN THE DRIVEWAY WHEN IT GOT SLIGHTLY STUCK IN A SMALL AMOUNT OF SNOW. THE CAR WAS TURNED OFF AND MY HUSBAND WENT TO GET A SHOVEL TO RELEASE THE SNOW BY THE WHEEL. WHEN HE TURNED AROUND, BLACK SMOKE WAS COMING FROM THE CAR! HE IMMEDIATELY CALLED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. IT ONLY TOOK A FEW SECONDS AND FLAMES BURST FROM THE CAR AND IT MADE POPPING NOISES. THE ENGINE OF THE CAR AND THE ENTIRE INSIDE, (SEATS, STEERING WHEEL, GLOVE COMPARTMENT ETC.) WERE COMPLETELY DESTROYED. THE FIREMAN STATED THAT IT WAS AN ELECTRICAL FIRE. WE PURCHASED THE CAR IN OCTOBER, 2010. WE HAVE NOW FOUND SIMILAR FIRES ON THE INTERNET BUT HAVE NOT SEEN 2011. WE FEEL THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC AND GMC MUST FIX IT BEFORE SOMEONE IS SERIOUSLY INJURED. MY HUSBAND WOULD HAVE BEEN DRIVING DOWN A STEEP HILL AND IF THE FIRE STARTED THERE HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET OUT! *TR

1/15/2013

16 more complaints are available in this category.

STRUCTURE:BODY

14 Reports6% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

I WAS EXITING THE FREEWAY AND STARTED TO TOUCH THE FRONT WINDOW BUTTON DOWN BUT IT WAS THE REAR WINDOW BUTTON AND IMMEDIATELY THE WHOLE CAR STARTED THIS SHAKING AND VIBRATING. I WAS SHOCKED AND SHOOK-UP BY THIS EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY PULLED OVER TO THE SIDE.LUCKILY, DOWN THE ROAD A BIT, I SAW A BUICK DEALERSHIP AND PROCEEDED TO IT. THE SERVICE MGR. TOLD ME BUICK IS AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM WHICH HE CALLED "WIND ABATEMENT".ONE OF HIS ASSOCIATES EVEN ASKED ME IF HE COULD COME WITH ME SO HE COULD WITNESS THIS EVENT. SO WE DID GO BACK TO THE FREEWAY,LET REAR WINDOW DOWN, AND HE WITNESSED IT HIMSELF.THE BUICK DEALER DENIED ANY DEFECTS IN THE CAR AND ADVISED ME TO CRACK A FRONT WINDOW ABOUT AN INCH, THEN LET THE REAR WINDOW DOWN. THIS WHOLE EPISODE HAS LEFT ME IN A STATE OF SHOCK AND NOT KNOWING IF THIS VEHICLE IS SAFE TO DRIVE.

1/20/2012

THE FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER DOORS HAVE A VERY SHARP PLASTIC EDGE STICKING OUT PAST THE METAL BODY OF THE DOOR. THIS HAS CAUSED INJURY TO THREE PEOPLE INCLUDING MYSELF. THE PLASTIC IS SO SHARP THAT IT HAS CUT DEEP WOUNDS INTO THE LEGS OF THE PERSON GETTING IN OR OUT OF THIS VEHICLE. I HAVE TRIED TO FIND OUT IF ANYONE ELSE HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM AND NO ONE HAS BROUGHT THIS FORWARD FOR REVIEW. I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE THAT NO ONE ELSE HAS HAD THIS PROBLEM. MAYBE THEY FIGURE THEY WERE CLUMSY AND IT WAS THEIR FAULT. I CUT THE CORNERS OFF AND SANDED THEM TO A SMOOTH FINISH TO CORRECT THIS PROBLEM. *TR

6/13/2012

12 more complaints are available in this category.

VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL

13 Reports5% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT ANY SPEED WITH THE CRUISE CONTROL ENGAGED, THE VEHICLE WOULD FLUCTUATE BETWEEN DRIVING 5 MPH FASTER OR 4 MPH SLOWER THAN THE INTENDED SPEED. WHILE DRIVING UPHILL, THE VEHICLE WOULD DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 4 MPH SLOWER THAN THE INTENDED SPEED. WHILE DRIVING DOWNHILL, THE VEHICLE WOULD DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH FASTER THAN THE INTENDED SPEED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT WAS INFORMED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS OPERATING AS INTENDED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 750. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.

6/27/2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL GOT STUCK IN A PARTIALLY DEPRESSED POSITION AND THE BRAKES WOULD NOT STOP THE VEHICLE WHEN ENGAGED. THE VEHICLE WAS PLACED INTO NEUTRAL BEFORE CRASHING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THEY WERE UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE, BUT THE PHYSICAL DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 2,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 2,700.

7/18/2011

11 more complaints are available in this category.

ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)

11 Reports4% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

DRIVING ON HIGHWAY. WARNING LIGHT FOR STABILITRACK CAME ON, THEN ENGINE POWER REDUCED LIGHT. IN SECONDS NO POWER TO VEHICLE. COULD NOT ACCELERATE AT ALL AND VEHICLE SLOWED ON ITS OWN. EXTREMELY DANGEROUS IN TRAFFIC WHEN TRYING TO PULL OVER WITH NO POWER. MANUAL SAYS TURN OFF CAR WAIT 15 SECONDS TO CORRECT PROBLEM. ASSUMING YOU DON'T GET KILLED PULLING OVER FIRST, NICE IDEA. DOESN'T WORK. HAD TO STOP VEHICLE MORE THAN TEN TIMES ON WAY HOME DUE TO SAME PROBLEM. BROUGHT VEHICLE INTO DEALER. SAME PROBLEM PERSISTS. *TR

12/10/2013

ON MARCH 27 2014 MY BUICK ENCLAVE GAVE ME AN ERROR MESSAGE ON THE DASH WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY TRACTION CONTROL OFF, STABILITY TRANSMISSION NEEDS SERVICE, AND REDUCED POWER CAME ON.THE CAR WENT FROM 60 MPH TO 50 MPH SUDDENLY BUT THEN CLEARED UP.I TOOK THE CAR INTO THE DEALER TO BE SERVICED ON 03/28/2014. THE LOCAL DEALER STATED THAT THEY FOUND THE ISSUE AND CORRECTED IT.ON APRIL 16 2014 I HAD THE SAME ISSUE HOWEVER THE EVENT WAS MUCH WORST. I WAS ON THE A MAJOR HIGHWAY DOING 65 MPH. THE CAR DID NOT GIVE ME ANY INDICATION OF ANY ISSSUE. THE DASHBOARD DISPLAYED TRACTION CONTROL OFF, SERVICE TRACTION, AND SERVICE STABILITRAK AND VERY QUICK AND SUDDENLY I LOST ALL POWER TO THE CAR WHILE TRAVELING DOWN THE HIGHWAY AT 65 MPH. THE SPEEDOMETER STATED I WAS STILL AT 65 MPH HOWEVER THE CAR WAS NOT TRAVELING AT 65. I TRIED PULLING ON MY HAZARD LIGHTS BUT THEY DID NOT WORK AT THE TIME. THE POWER STEELING ON THE VEHICLE DID NOT WORK. THE GAS PEDAL DID NOT EXCEL THE CAR. I WAS ALMOST HIT BY A TRACTOR TRAILOR WHO WAS TRAVELING BEHIND ME. I TRIED MOVING TO THE SLOW LANE HOWEVER THE CAR HAD NO POWER STERRING BUT THE ENGINE WAS ON AND THE GAS PEDAL WAS TO THE FLOOR BUT THE CAR WAS NOT ACCELERATION. I HAD NO POWER IN THE CAR, I WAS ABLE TO GET TO A SAFE SPOT WERE I TRIED TURNING THE CAR OFF AND BACK ON. THAT DID NOT SOLVE ANY ISSUES EXCEPT FOR THE HAZARD LIGHTS. I WAS THEN ABLE TO PUT ON MY HAZARD LIGHTS. THE CAR NEVER GAVE ME AN ERROR THAT I HAD REDUCED POWER. EVERYTHING OCCURRED IN ABOUT 2 MINUTES. I IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED THE DEALER TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED. I HAVE MAJOR SAFETY CONCERNS ABOUT THE 2011 BUICK ENCLAVES!!!!! I AM VERY LUCKY THAT I WAS NOT KILLED ON HWY 540. I DON'T THINK MY AIR BAGS WOULD HAVE DEPLOYED IF I WERE HIT BY A TRACTOR TRAILER OR CAR. NOTHING WAS WORKING IN THE CAR. PLEASE CALL ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS!!

4/17/2014

9 more complaints are available in this category.

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

9 Reports4% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

2011 BUICK ENCLAVE, ALL RECALLS COMPLETED. WHEN TURNING INTO DRIVEWAY FROM A TOTAL STOP VEHICLE EXPERIENCED UNEXPECTED ACCELERATION AND CRASHED THROUGH PART-WAY UP GARAGE DOOR, SIDE WALL OF GARAGE, (RIGHT WHEEL OVER 6" CONCRETE FOUNDATION), PUSHED ITEMS STORED IN GARAGE INTO FRONT WALL AND MOVED WALL 12" INTO LAUNDRY ROOM. VEHICLE STOPPED WHEN LEFT FRONT WHEEL HIT CONCRETE STEP INTO SERVICE DOOR ALTHOUGH TIRE LEFT TREAD MARK ON FLOOR UNTIL ENGINE TURNED OFF. DISTANCE TRAVELED WAS ABOUT 2 1/2 CAR LENGTHS. DAMAGE TO RIGHT FRONT MAINLY. $12,300 DEALER ESTIMATED DAMAGE. DRIVER SUFFERED SOFT TISSUE BRUISING, CHIPPED TOOTH, SORENESS. AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. ODB SHOWED NO DTC CODES. VEHICLE VISUALLY/MANUALLY INSPECTED BY DEALER PER INSURANCE COMPANY REQUEST - NOTHING FOUND. CLAIM FILED WITH ESIS/GM CENTRAL CLAIMS UNIT. EDR, SDM & CDR DATA WERE DOWNLOADED USING BOSCH SOFTWARE AND PICTURES TAKEN OF VEHICLE. DATA/PICTURES WERE TURNED OVER TO GM INVESTIGATORS. OWNER CONTACTED ONSTAR FOR DATA BUT NOTHING WAS RECEIVED BY THEM. HOWEVER, INITIAL SDM DATA INDICATES 'ONSTAR DEPLOYMENT STATUS DATA SENT' AND 'SDM RECORDED VEHICLE VELOCITY CHANGE DATA SENT.' INVESTIGATION CURRENTLY 3 MONTHS ON-GOING, VEHICLE UNTOUCHED. VEHICLE ALSO PREVIOUSLY EXHIBITED ISSUE OF FREE ROLLING BACKWARD OR FORWARD WHEN STOPPED ON AN INCLINE. AUTO TRANSMISSION AND TORQUE CONVERTER WOULD NOT HOLD VEHICLE. *TR

11/6/2014

WE WERE DRIVING DOWN THE HIGHWAY AT 65 MPH THE STABILITRAK / TRACTION CONTROL LIGHT CAME ON FOLLOWED BY AN ENGINE REDUCED POWER WARNING AND THE VEHICLE SLOWS FROM 65 MPH TO 30 MPH IN ABOUT 3 SECONDS. THE ERROR MESSAGE CLEARS ITSELF WHEN THE VEHICLE IS TURNED OFF AND LEFT OFF FOR 1 TO 5 MINUTES. THE SECOND TIME THIS HAPPENED WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY RESET THE CODES AS A CHECK ENGINE LIGHT WAS ALSO ON. THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN AND THE ERROR MESSAGE CODE INDICATED AN IDLE PROBLEM. THE DEALER DIAGNOSED AND THE TSB STATED TO RELEARN THE IDLE WHICH COST ABOUT $220. THIS PROBLEM OCCURRED TWO MORE TIMES WITH SIMILAR DECELERATIONS FROM 45+ TO ABOUT 25 -30 MPH IN 3 SECONDS. THE CAR FORUMS ON THE INTERNET FOR CHEVY TRAVERSE, GMC ACADIA LIST MANY PEOPLE WITH SIMILAR ISSUES. MANY HAVE CALLED GM AND HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT GM IS NOT AWARE OF THIS AS A MAJOR PROBLEM. SOME CLAIM THERE WAS A PRIVATE RECALL ON THE 2010 MODELS. *TR

11/18/2014

7 more complaints are available in this category.

POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION

5 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE WAS SITTING ON AN INCLINE WITH THE BRAKES DEPRESSED. AS HE RELEASED THE BRAKES, THE VEHICLE ABNORMALLY ROLLED BACKWARD APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET. THE FAILURE WOULD OCCUR SPORADICALLY WHEN ON AN INCLINE. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED AND ADVISED THAT THE FAILURE WAS NORMAL. HE THEN CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND WAS ADVISED TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 300 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 369.

3/3/2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING ON AN INCLINE WITH HIS YOUR FOOT ON THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE VEHICLE WOULD ROLL BACKWARDS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO STATED THE FAILURE WAS NORMAL FOR A MANUAL VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THERE WAS NO FAILURE AND THE VEHICLE WAS FUNCTIONING NORMALLY. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80. UPDATED 09/19/11 *BF UPDATED 11/02/11

8/4/2011

3 more complaints are available in this category.

SERVICE BRAKES

5 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

WHEN CAR IS ON A INCLINE WHEN YOU TAKE YOUR FOOT OF BRAKE IT ROLLS BACKWARD,JUST PURCHASE THE CAR ON 8/8/2013 TOOK IT BACK TO DEALER THEY SAY THAT'S HOW IT IS,NOTHING WRONG.(SAFETY HAZARD??) *TR

9/17/2013

WHEN MY BUICK HAS BEEN ON INCLINE IN THE DRIVE OR REVERSE GEAR, MY BUICK ROLLS BACKWARDS OR FORWARDS DEPENDING ON THE DIRECTION OF THE INCLINE WITHOUT STOPPING. IT MAKES IT NECESSARY TO HOLD THE BRAKE WITH ONE FOOT AND ACCELERATE WITH THE OTHER. THE PROBLEM USED TO BE A SMALL ROLL BACK BUT HAS RECENTLY BECOME TO A POINT WHERE THE CAR DOESN'T STOP ROLLING. THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AS IT DOES NOT ALLOW THE DRIVER TO HAVE CONTROL OF THE CAR. I'M EXTREMELY WORRIED IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITH DRIVEWAYS ON AN INCLINE AS IT WILL MAKE IT HARD TO STOP THE CAR IF A KID IS EITHER IN FRONT OR BEHIND THE CAR WHEN THIS OCCURS. *TR

7/15/2014

3 more complaints are available in this category.

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

4 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

HID LIGHTS TURN OFF AFTER OUR 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE IS DRIVEN AFTER 30 SECONDS. HEADLIGHTS COME ON WHEN VEHICLE IS FIRST STARTED AT 4:30 A.M. AND TURNS OFF AS INDICATED ABOVE. ISSUE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE BUICK DEALERSHIP BUT CANNOT DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE ISSUE ON THREE VISITS. THERE ARE NO RECALLS FROM THE MANUFACTURER, AS STATED BY THE SERVICE ADVISOR. MANIPULATING THE CONTROLS IS THE ONLY WORKAROUND. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

9/11/2012

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT OR SPEED, THE DAYTIME RUNNING LAMPS DIMMED. THE CONTACT WAS NOT DOING ANYTHING TO TRIGGER THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE VIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 90,000.

10/17/2016

2 more complaints are available in this category.

TIRES

4 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

MY VEHICLE WAS ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH MICHELIN LATITUDE TOUR 255/60R19 TIRES. AT JUST OVER 16,000 MILES I NOTICED CRACKS IN THE SIDEWALLS. AT 20,000 MILES A REPRESENTATIVE FROM MICHELIN ASSURED ME THAT IT WAS NOT A CONCERN. AT 22,000 MILES I PRESENTED THE VEHICLE TO THE SELLING DEALER AND WAS PROVIDED WITH A SERVICE BULLETIN WHICH STATED THAT THE STANCE OF THE MANUFACTURER WAS THAT THE CONDITION WAS ONLY INCIDENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND POSED NO SAFETY CONCERN. SINCE THAT TIME, I HAVE CONTACTED BOTH THE TIRE AND VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS WITH NO RESOLUTION. I CAN PROVIDE CASE NUMBERS AND EMAILS. THE TIRE MANUFACTURER HAS ISSUED A RECALL FOR THIS MODEL TIRE BUT THEY TELL ME THAT THE NUMERICAL RUN OF MY TIRES IS NOT INCLUDED. POSSIBLY THE SCOPE OF THE RECALL IS TOO NARROW. MY CONTENTION IS THAT THIS IS A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT AND A MAJOR SAFETY CONCERN FOR MYSELF, MY FAMILY, AND OTHER MOTORISTS. BECAUSE THE CONDITION HAS WORSENED SO MUCH IN SO FEW MILES, I FEEL THAT MICHELIN AND GENERAL MOTORS NEED TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM IMMEDIATELY. THE TIRES SHOULD BE REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY, NOT AT THE PRO-RATE POLICY NOW IN PLACE. ANY ASSISTANCE WITH THIS SITUATION WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED THANK YOU *TR

9/11/2013

AT APPROXIMATELY 18000 MILES I NOTICED THAT MY MICHELIN TIRES HAD SMALL CRACKS IN THEM. SINCE THEY WERE NOT WORRISOME AT THAT TIME, I JUST DECIDED TO KEEP AN EYE ON MY TIRES, FOR BULGES OR LARGER CRACKS. I RECENTLY HAD MY TIRES REPLACED, LESS THAN 40000 MILES ON THEM BECAUSE I WAS GETTING READY TO GO ON A ROAD TRIP AND DIDN'T WANT TO TAKE THE CHANCE. MY TIRES WERE HEAVILY CRACKED AND ONE WAS LOSING AIR DAILY. I FIRST CONTACTED GM DIRECTLY (PRIOR TO REPLACING THE TIRES) TO SEE IF THEY WERE UNDER WARRANTY OR KNOWN DEFECTIVE/RECALL ITEMS. WHEN I SPOKE TO THE DEALER ABOUT THE TIRES BEING DEFECTIVE, THEY INSISTED THE TIRES WERE NOT DEFECTIVE, THAT MICHELIN ADDS SILICA TO THEIR TIRES IN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND THE SILICA ADDITION DOES NOT DO WELL IN HOT/DRY CLIMATES. THEY INDICATED THAT BECAUSE MICHELIN DOES ADD SILICA ON PURPOSE THE TIRES ARE NOT DEFECTIVE. MY ARGUMENT IS THAT THE TIRES ARE DEFECTIVE IF THEY DO NOT MAINTAIN THEIR INTEGRITY IN ALL CLIMATES. MY BUICK DEALERSHIP DID NOT HONOR THE BUICK WARRANTY. REF NHTSA ID NUMBER 10543165, AS I AM NOT THE ONLY CUSTOMER WITH THE PROBLEM AND TIRE INTEGRITY IS A VERY IMPORTANT SAFETY FEATURE ON VEHICLES. THIS NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND A RECALL ISSUED. I REPLACED MY TIRES WITH GOODYEAR TIRES AT JUST UNDER $900. ON A $50,000 CAR, HAVING TO REPLACE TIRES BEFORE 3 YEARS / 40,000 MILES IS UNACCEPTABLE. JUST IN CASE GM LOOKS AT THESE COMPLAINTS. YOU HAVE LOST A LOYAL CUSTOMER. I'VE BOUGHT 6 BRAND NEW GM CARS AND ONE SLIGHTLY USED GM CAR. HALF OF THOSE CARS HAVE HAD PROBLEMS, WHY I HAVE REMAINED A LOYAL CUSTOMER, WHO KNOWS... *TR

11/20/2014

2 more complaints are available in this category.

SEAT BELTS

4 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TURNED CORNER ON IRONWOOD46615 AND REAR ENDED CAR THAT STOPPED SUDDENLY. CRUSHED MY FRONT END BACK TO PUNCTURING THE RADIATOR. NO AIR BAG DEPLOYED AND NO SEAT BELT ON IMPACT. MY KNEES HIT THE DASH UNDER THE STEERING WHEEL. NO ONSTAR AS NO AIRBAG DEPLOYED. HOLDING STEERING WHEEL WAS MY ONLY DETERRENT TO HITTING FORWARD. REPAIRS COST $5000.+ AND GM DEALER INSISTED AIRBAG AND SEAT BELT WERE FUNCTIONING. KNEES STILL HURT. AND SEEN DOCTOR ABOUT KNEES AND GOING AGAIN SOON. I AM REPORTING THIS AFTER HEARING THAT THERE ARE RECALLED ON SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS ON DRIVER SIDE. *TR

3/20/2014

DRIVER EXITING A PARKING LOT DID NOT SEE MY VEHICLE AND DID NOT STOP. HIT MY VEHICLE MID WAY ON THE PASSENGER SIDE PUSHING MY VEHICLE SIDEWAYS CAUSING IT TO HIT A LIGHT POLE ON THE DRIVER SIDE FRONT FENDER AND HOOD. AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY AND SEAT BELT DID NOT WORK CAUSING ME TO HIT THE STEERING WHEEL WITH MY CHEST AND MY KNEE ON THE DASH. I WAS TAKEN TO EMERGENCY ROOM. NOTHING WAS BROKEN BUT HAD EXTENSIVE SOFT TISSUE, MUSCLE STRAINS AND CARTILAGE DAMAGE. AM STILL RECEIVING TREATMENT AT THIS TIME. *TR

9/6/2014

2 more complaints are available in this category.

STRUCTURE:BODY:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE

4 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

GAS GAUGE WASN'T WORKING ON MY 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE ESPECIALLY WHEN WEATHER WAS COLD. GAS GAUGE WOULD SHOW LESS THAN WAS IN THE TANK. HAPPENED ONCE OR TWICE IN 2012, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS A FLUKE. THEN, SEVERAL TIMES IN WINTER OF 2013- SO, I FINALLY TOOK IT IN DEC 2013 AFTER GETTING A MESSAGE IN THE CAR OF A SENSOR FAILURE. THEY QUOTED $517.27 TO FIX IT AND SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE TIME THAT DAY. TOOK BACK IN EARLY JAN. WARRANTY JUST EXPIRED BY 3000 MILES, SO I ARGUED IT SHOULD BE COVERED. DEALERSHIP MADE ME PAY $100 TOWARDS IT. THEY REPLACED THE FUEL LEVEL SENSOR. I HAVE HAD IT HAPPEN ONCE AGAIN SINCE, SO I AM WONDERING IF THEY FIXED THE RIGHT PART, ALTHOUGH I WOULD WANT TO SEE IT HAPPEN AGAIN TO BE SURE BEFORE I COMPLAIN AGAIN, ALTHOUGH WAITING TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS A PROBLEM WAS WHAT GOT ME OUT OF WARRANTY WHEN I ORIGINALLY TOOK IN IT TO HAVE FIXED. AS I SEE THE RECENT RECALL IN MAY 2014 OF ONLY THE 2013 BUICK ENCLAVE MODELS FOR THE SAME GAS GAUGE ISSUE, I AM FRUSTRATED. OBVIOUSLY, THE PROBLEM IS MORE PERVASIVE THAN JUST THE 2013 MODELS. SAFETY OF THIS MODEL SEEMS TO BE AN ISSUE. NOW, I SAW THERE IS AIRBAG RECALL, ALTHOUGH I HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED YET. I HAD WATER PUMP ISSUE FAIL THE WEEK AFTER I HAD IT CHECKED FOR RECALL NOTICE AND THEY HAD SAID IT WAS FINE AND DIDN'T NEED FIXED. SCARY AS I GOT NOTICE ALL OF A SUDDEN THAT CAR WAS SHUTTING DOWN AND IT DID - LUCKILY, I WASN'T ON THE FREEWAY AND COULD PULL OFF QUICKLY, BUT I WAS STILL STRANDED WITHOUT WARNING. FRUSTRATING AFTER I JUST TOOK IT IN FOR THIS RECALL ISSUE AND WAS TOLD IT WAS FINE. I'VE ALSO HAD THE LIFTGATE ISSUE (RELEASE SWITCH FAILED), ISSUE WITH DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR, AND A/C ISSUE - ALL IN A CAR THAT ISN'T THAT OLD. *TR

5/5/2014

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE LIFTGATE INDEPENDENTLY OPERATED. THE FAILURE OCCURRED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE LIFTGATE SWITCH WAS DEFECTIVE AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. PRIOR TO THE RECALL, THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V415000 (STRUCTURE). THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 10,800.

4/5/2016

2 more complaints are available in this category.

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

4 Reports2% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

(1) DRIVER DOOR BOUNCES BACK AND CLOSES AFTER OPEN IT AND WHEN YOU THINK IT IS SECURE AND ABLE TO EXIT VEHICLE (EVEN IF DONE CAREFULLY, SLOWLY AND DELIBERATELY)--FINGER CAUGHT IN DOOR AND NOW PERMANENTLY BENT AND DAMAGED; (2) BACK HATCH SLAMS DOWN WITH NO WARNING--CLOSED ON ME AND MY 4-YEAR OLD SON WHILE WE WERE STANDING UNDER IT CHANGING HIS CLOTHES; AND (3) FUEL TANK WILL NOT ALLOW GAS TO PUMP (SPENT UP TO 10 MINUTES TRYING TO PUMP GAS AND GOT NOT EVEN 1 GALLON (VIDEO AVAILABLE). HUSBAND FIXED HATCH. ALL WERE REPORTED TO LOCAL DEALER IN PERSON AND EXCUSES ONLY THING GIVEN; DID NOT OFFER TO LOOK INTO ANYTHING FURTHER UNLESS I PAID REGULAR CHARGES AND WANTED TO SHOW ME "TRICKS" THEY USE FOR PUMPING GAS BECAUSE IT HAPPENS TO PERSON HELPING ME AT DEALER WITH HIS BUICK ALSO. REPORTED TO GM CORPORATE VIA WEBSITE AND NOTHING DONE (CLOSED MY FILE AS "UNSATISFIED"). THIS WAS ALL BEFORE RECALL ON HATCH WAS ISSUED (WHICH BUICK STILL HAS NOT FIGURED OUT A FIX FOR IT). LETTER SENT TO GMC LEGAL DEPARTMENT WITH NO RESPONSE. TOO MANY SAFETY ISSUES WITH THIS CAR. CANNOT BE TRUSTED, ESPECIALLY AFTER YOU TELL THE MANUFACTURER OF PROBLEMS AND THEY DO NOTHING. THEY OWE FOR THE HATCH FIX AND ALSO FOR PERSONAL INJURIES. THEY SHOULD BE FORCED TO BUY THIS CAR BACK SINCE THEY CANNOT WARN OF DESIGN DEFECTS AND PUT THEIR CUSTOMERS AT RISK.

9/1/2015

THE FUEL MILEAGE READER IS NOT WORKING PROPERLY...SOMETIMES WHEN I GET GAS IT REGISTERS MORE MILEAGE THAN IT SHOULD. ...SUCH AS IT MAY BE ON EMPTY AND THE AMOUNT OF FUEL THAT I PUT IN IT SHOULD REGISTER THAT I WOULD GET 115 MILES OFF IT....BUT IT WILL REGISTER THAT I SHOULD GET 150 MILES. SOMETIMES IT REGISTERS RIGHT AND I CAN DRIVE ONLY 10 MILES AND THE NUMBER OF MILES THAT I CAN TRAVEL WILL DROP BY 28 MILES OR MORE. IT CHANGES AS I DRIVE BUT DOESN'T SHOW THE PROPER MILEAGE LEFT AS BE APPROPRIATE. ALSO MY HEAT IS ONLY COMING OUT THE VENTS IN THE REAR AND THE TOP SIDE DASH VENTS AND THE BOTTOM DRIVER SIDE FLOOR VENT. THE FRONT DASH VENTS HAVE NO HEAT AND THE BOTTOM FLOOR PASSENGER VENT IS BLOWING COOL AIR. THE HEAT PROBLEM IS WHEN DRIVING AND SITING. THE MILEAGE READER IS OCCURRING WHEN DRIVING AND AFTER REFILLING AND SOMETIMES WHILE SITTING WITH THE CAR RUNNING.

1/18/2018

2 more complaints are available in this category.

STRUCTURE

3 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

I PURCHASED A NEW BUICK ENCLAVE ON OR ABOUT 4 FEB. 2011, ON OR ABOUT 12 APRIL 2011 I HAD THE BACK WINDOW DOWN WITHOUT KNOWING IT AS I HIT ABOUT 45 MPH THIS HORRIBLE NOISE APPEARED IN THE CAR. I PULLED OFF THE ROAD THINKING THAT THE ENGINE BLEW UP, BUT THIS WAS NOT THE CASE. THE SOUND CAME FROM HAVING THE BACK WINDOW DOWN. I CONTACTED THE DEALER ABOUT THIS AND WAS TOLD THERE WAS NOTHING THAT COULD BE DONE ABOUT IT. I LATER TOOK DECIBEL READINGS OF THIS AND THEY ARE AT 94 DB AT 45 MPH. AS SPEED IS INCREASED THE DECIBEL READINGS ALSO INCREASED. I COULD ONLY TAKE THE READINGS UP TO 60 MPH AS THE DECIBEL METER I HAD DID NOT GO ABOVE 120 DB. THIS WILL CAUSE HEARING LOSS AND POSSIBLY PERMANENT HEARING LOSS TO SMALL CHILDREN AND BABIES. THIS PROBLEM NEEDS TO BE FIXED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ALSO THE WHOLE CAR SHAKES AND IS VERY DISTRACTING TO THE DRIVER. STATUS UPDATE. 08/30/11

7/14/2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL STARTED TO MAKE A SQUEAKY NOISE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING GEAR FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 62,000. UPDATED 08/19/14*LJ UPDATED 07/06/2017 *CT

6/12/2014

1 more complaint is available in this category.

SEATS

3 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

*PURCHASED NEW IN AUGUST 2010, REPORTED BACK TO DEALERSHIP THERE WAS MOVEMENT IN SEAT BACK/BOTTOM OR BOTH. HAVE RETURNED AND COMMUNICATED WITH SELLING DEALERSHIP AND GENERAL MOTORS (SERVICE REQUEST #71-929161000) ON THIS ONGOING PROBLEM AS MOVEMENT STILL EXISTS IN SEAT. ATTEMPTED TO REPAIR SEAT THREE TIMES AND FAILED. PROBLEM IS STILL EXISTS AND GM HEADQUARTERS IN DETROIT IS STANDING BY THEIR FIELD SERVICE REP AND THE DEALSHIP SAYING THERE IS NO PROBLEM IN THEIR VIEW. HAVING SAID THIS, NO ONE HAS SEEN THE VEHICLE TO EXAMINE IF IN FACT REPAIRS WERE SUCCESSFUL AFTER THEIR LAST ATTEMPT AT REPLACING PARTS ON THE SEAT FRAME. NO REPRESENTATIVE FROM , GM FIELD SERVICE MANAGER OR ANYONE ELSE REPRESENTING GM. SO, I DONT KNOW HOW THEY CAN SAY THE PROBLEM IS FIXED IF THEY ARE STILL RECEIVING COMPLAINTS AND HAVE NOT EXAMINED THE SEAT FOR WARRANTS OF THIS COMPLAINT. ADDITIONALLY I HAVE TAKEN THIS VEHICLE TO A PRIVATELY OWNED AUTO SERVICE CENTER: I AM THANKFUL TO NOT ONLY PROVIDED GREAT SERVICE BUT HAS ALSO DETECTED THE ROOT PROBLEM IN THE SEAT AND PROVIDED THEIR OPTION ON WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO REMEDY THIS PROBLEM - REPLACE THE SEAT. WHEN I PROVIDED THIS INFORMATION TO GM HEADQUARTERS, THEY REVIEWED THE INFORMATION AND CAME BACK WITH THE SAME REPEATED RESPONSE INDICATING THAT ALTHOUGH THEY UNDERSTAND I AM NOT SATISFIED WITH THEIR RESPONSE, THEY HAVE NOTHING MORE TO ADD IN TERMS OF CORRECTING THIS PROBLEM I HAVE EXPERIENCED SINCE I PURCHASED THIS VEHICLE FROM THE DEALERSHIP. I AM CONCERNED AS TO THE SEAT PROVIDING STABILITY WHEN STOPPING IN AN EMERGENCY WHEN NEEDED MOST IN ADDITION TO THE SEAT WEARING OUT WELL BEFORE ITS TIME. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) *TT

9/27/2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MOLDING COVER FOR THE DRIVER'S SIDE SEAT CONTROLS FAILED. THE CONTACT STATED THE SEAT DID NOT STOP OPERATING, BUT THE WIRES FOR THE CONTROLS WERE EXPOSED HAPHAZARDLY. THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND THE PART WAS REPLACED. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE CONTROLS WOULD HAVE FAILED IF THEY WERE NOT REPAIRED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE AND THE CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 20,000.

2/19/2013

1 more complaint is available in this category.

SUSPENSION

3 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL STARTED TO MAKE A SQUEAKY NOISE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING GEAR FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 62,000. UPDATED 08/19/14*LJ UPDATED 07/06/2017 *CT

6/12/2014

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REAR DRIVER'S SIDE COIL SPRING FRACTURED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE REAR DRIVER'S SIDE COIL SPRING WAS REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 55,000.

2/11/2015

1 more complaint is available in this category.

EQUIPMENT:ELECTRICAL:NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM(GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM)

2 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO A MISSING COMPASS *TGW GM INFORMED THE CONSUMER, THE VEHICLE DID NOT COME EQUIPPED WITH A COMPASS, BECAUSE IT HAS A NAVIGATION OPTION AND THEREFORE WAS REDUNDANT. *JB

8/11/2011

MISSING EASY TO VIEW NAVIGATION COMPASS IN BUICK ENCLAVE DRIVER INFORMATION CENTER DISPLAY. BECAUSE WE ORDERED THE OPTIONAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM TO OBTAIN THE REAR VIEW CAMERA DISPLAY, OUR DEALER ADVISED US THAT THE COMPASS DISPLAY CANNOT BE ADDED TO THE DIC DISPLAY AT THIS TIME. THE NAV COMPASS DISPLAY IS HARD TO VIEW ON THE LEFT UPPER SCREEN DISPLAY, NON-INTUITIVE, AND UNSAFE FOR THE DRIVER TAKING THEIR EYES OFF THE ROAD. AND, YOU MUST HAVE THE NAV DISPLAY ENABLED. OUR 2002 BUICK RENDEZVOUS HAD THIS DIC COMPASS DISPLAY AND THE 2011 CADILLAC SRX THAT WE WERE CONSIDERING BUYING. BUICK MARKETING/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MADE A POOR SAFETY DECISION IN NOT HAVING A REDUNDANT COMPASS DISPLAY FOR A MSRP $48.5K VEHICLE. I USED THIS DIC COMPASS DISPLAY IN UNFAMILIAR DRIVING AREAS FREQUENTLY. A MARKET FOCUS CUSTOMER SURVEY GROUP WOULD HAVE DISCLOSED THIS ISSUE. WE FILED A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT FORM WITH BUICK'S CAC CENTER. BUT, THE DEALER ADVISED ME THE CASE FILE WOULD BE SENT TO THE DEALER INSTEAD OF TO BUICK MARKETING/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT! THE ROOMINESS AND VALUE WERE THE MAIN REASONS FOR SELECTING THE ENCLAVE. MOUNTING AN AFTERMARKET COMPASS IN A LUXURY VEHICLE IS A POOR SOLUTION! *KB

8/18/2011

FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE

2 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

GAS GAUGE WASN'T WORKING ON MY 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE ESPECIALLY WHEN WEATHER WAS COLD. GAS GAUGE WOULD SHOW LESS THAN WAS IN THE TANK. HAPPENED ONCE OR TWICE IN 2012, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS A FLUKE. THEN, SEVERAL TIMES IN WINTER OF 2013- SO, I FINALLY TOOK IT IN DEC 2013 AFTER GETTING A MESSAGE IN THE CAR OF A SENSOR FAILURE. THEY QUOTED $517.27 TO FIX IT AND SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE TIME THAT DAY. TOOK BACK IN EARLY JAN. WARRANTY JUST EXPIRED BY 3000 MILES, SO I ARGUED IT SHOULD BE COVERED. DEALERSHIP MADE ME PAY $100 TOWARDS IT. THEY REPLACED THE FUEL LEVEL SENSOR. I HAVE HAD IT HAPPEN ONCE AGAIN SINCE, SO I AM WONDERING IF THEY FIXED THE RIGHT PART, ALTHOUGH I WOULD WANT TO SEE IT HAPPEN AGAIN TO BE SURE BEFORE I COMPLAIN AGAIN, ALTHOUGH WAITING TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS A PROBLEM WAS WHAT GOT ME OUT OF WARRANTY WHEN I ORIGINALLY TOOK IN IT TO HAVE FIXED. AS I SEE THE RECENT RECALL IN MAY 2014 OF ONLY THE 2013 BUICK ENCLAVE MODELS FOR THE SAME GAS GAUGE ISSUE, I AM FRUSTRATED. OBVIOUSLY, THE PROBLEM IS MORE PERVASIVE THAN JUST THE 2013 MODELS. SAFETY OF THIS MODEL SEEMS TO BE AN ISSUE. NOW, I SAW THERE IS AIRBAG RECALL, ALTHOUGH I HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED YET. I HAD WATER PUMP ISSUE FAIL THE WEEK AFTER I HAD IT CHECKED FOR RECALL NOTICE AND THEY HAD SAID IT WAS FINE AND DIDN'T NEED FIXED. SCARY AS I GOT NOTICE ALL OF A SUDDEN THAT CAR WAS SHUTTING DOWN AND IT DID - LUCKILY, I WASN'T ON THE FREEWAY AND COULD PULL OFF QUICKLY, BUT I WAS STILL STRANDED WITHOUT WARNING. FRUSTRATING AFTER I JUST TOOK IT IN FOR THIS RECALL ISSUE AND WAS TOLD IT WAS FINE. I'VE ALSO HAD THE LIFTGATE ISSUE (RELEASE SWITCH FAILED), ISSUE WITH DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR, AND A/C ISSUE - ALL IN A CAR THAT ISN'T THAT OLD. *TR

5/5/2014

SIMILAR TO THE RECENTLY ANNOUNCED RECALL ON 2014 BUICK ENCLAVES FOR A FAULTY GAS GAUGE, THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURS ON THE 2011 MODEL THAT I JUST PURCHASED AS WELL. I HAVE OWNED THE VEHICLE FOR 6 WEEKS AND 3 TIMES HAVE EXPERIENCED THE GAS GAUGE INDICATE AN INACCURATE AMOUNT OF FUEL. TWICE AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS TURNED OFF AND TURNED BACK ON, THE GAUGE RESET TO AN ACCURATE READY. HOWEVER ONE AFTER TURNING THE VEHICLE OFF TWICE, THE GAS GAUGE DID NOT RESET.....IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE FOLLOWING DAY THAT THE GAS GAUGE GAVE A ACCURATE READING. *TR

5/7/2014

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

2 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

GAS GAUGE WASN'T WORKING ON MY 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE ESPECIALLY WHEN WEATHER WAS COLD. GAS GAUGE WOULD SHOW LESS THAN WAS IN THE TANK. HAPPENED ONCE OR TWICE IN 2012, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS A FLUKE. THEN, SEVERAL TIMES IN WINTER OF 2013- SO, I FINALLY TOOK IT IN DEC 2013 AFTER GETTING A MESSAGE IN THE CAR OF A SENSOR FAILURE. THEY QUOTED $517.27 TO FIX IT AND SAID THEY DIDN'T HAVE TIME THAT DAY. TOOK BACK IN EARLY JAN. WARRANTY JUST EXPIRED BY 3000 MILES, SO I ARGUED IT SHOULD BE COVERED. DEALERSHIP MADE ME PAY $100 TOWARDS IT. THEY REPLACED THE FUEL LEVEL SENSOR. I HAVE HAD IT HAPPEN ONCE AGAIN SINCE, SO I AM WONDERING IF THEY FIXED THE RIGHT PART, ALTHOUGH I WOULD WANT TO SEE IT HAPPEN AGAIN TO BE SURE BEFORE I COMPLAIN AGAIN, ALTHOUGH WAITING TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS A PROBLEM WAS WHAT GOT ME OUT OF WARRANTY WHEN I ORIGINALLY TOOK IN IT TO HAVE FIXED. AS I SEE THE RECENT RECALL IN MAY 2014 OF ONLY THE 2013 BUICK ENCLAVE MODELS FOR THE SAME GAS GAUGE ISSUE, I AM FRUSTRATED. OBVIOUSLY, THE PROBLEM IS MORE PERVASIVE THAN JUST THE 2013 MODELS. SAFETY OF THIS MODEL SEEMS TO BE AN ISSUE. NOW, I SAW THERE IS AIRBAG RECALL, ALTHOUGH I HAVEN'T BEEN NOTIFIED YET. I HAD WATER PUMP ISSUE FAIL THE WEEK AFTER I HAD IT CHECKED FOR RECALL NOTICE AND THEY HAD SAID IT WAS FINE AND DIDN'T NEED FIXED. SCARY AS I GOT NOTICE ALL OF A SUDDEN THAT CAR WAS SHUTTING DOWN AND IT DID - LUCKILY, I WASN'T ON THE FREEWAY AND COULD PULL OFF QUICKLY, BUT I WAS STILL STRANDED WITHOUT WARNING. FRUSTRATING AFTER I JUST TOOK IT IN FOR THIS RECALL ISSUE AND WAS TOLD IT WAS FINE. I'VE ALSO HAD THE LIFTGATE ISSUE (RELEASE SWITCH FAILED), ISSUE WITH DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR, AND A/C ISSUE - ALL IN A CAR THAT ISN'T THAT OLD. *TR

5/5/2014

AIR CONDITIONING WOULD RUN BUT NOT COOL/COLD. A/C HIGH PRESSURE HOSE ASS'Y HAD TO BE REPLACED, LEAKING. ONE OF THE FENDERS HAD TO BE REMOVED TO DO REPAIR. COST $466.00. *TR

9/12/2014

STRUCTURE:BODY:HATCHBACK/LIFTGATE:HINGE AND ATTACHMENTS

2 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. WHILE PLACING ITEMS INSIDE THE VEHICLE, THE LIFTGATE SLAMMED CLOSED AND HURT THE CONTACT'S BACK. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 59,000.

11/18/2014

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER THE LIFTGATE WAS OPENED, THE LIFTGATE INDEPENDENTLY CLOSED WITHOUT WARNING. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT SUSTAINED A HEAD INJURY THAT DID NOT REQUIRE MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE LIFTGATE STRUT ASSEMBLY NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V415000 (STRUCTURE) HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATE THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 55,606. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE.

11/10/2015

VISIBILITY/WIPER

2 Reports1% of total

Previewing the first 2 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH, THE WINDSHIELD BEGAN TO FOG UP. THE CONTACT HAD TO PULL OVER REPEATEDLY TO CLEAR THE WINDSHIELD. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE DEFROSTER FLAPPER VALVE FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. LATER, THE AIR TEMPERATURE ON THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDES OF THE VEHICLE VARIED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO ANOTHER DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED AGAIN. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURES. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 47,462.

5/19/2017

WINDSHIELD DEFROST BLOWER DOES DOES NOT BLOW ONTO WINDSHIELD, IT BLOWS INTO THE VEHICLE CABIN. WINDOWS NOT DEFROSTING. STATIONARY OR MOVING, MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

2/21/2018

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO OVERHEAT. HE THEN DISCOVERED THAT ENGINE ANTIFREEZE WAS LEAKING ALL OVER THE ENGINE AND HOOD BECAUSE THE FANS WERE STILL OPERATING. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE RADIATOR WAS PUNCTURE AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE WHO DID NOT OFFER ANY ASSISTANCE. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 10,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 11,000.

6/13/2011

EQUIPMENT

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

MISSING EASY TO VIEW NAVIGATION COMPASS IN BUICK ENCLAVE DRIVER INFORMATION CENTER DISPLAY. BECAUSE WE ORDERED THE OPTIONAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM TO OBTAIN THE REAR VIEW CAMERA DISPLAY, OUR DEALER ADVISED US THAT THE COMPASS DISPLAY CANNOT BE ADDED TO THE DIC DISPLAY AT THIS TIME. THE NAV COMPASS DISPLAY IS HARD TO VIEW ON THE LEFT UPPER SCREEN DISPLAY, NON-INTUITIVE, AND UNSAFE FOR THE DRIVER TAKING THEIR EYES OFF THE ROAD. AND, YOU MUST HAVE THE NAV DISPLAY ENABLED. OUR 2002 BUICK RENDEZVOUS HAD THIS DIC COMPASS DISPLAY AND THE 2011 CADILLAC SRX THAT WE WERE CONSIDERING BUYING. BUICK MARKETING/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MADE A POOR SAFETY DECISION IN NOT HAVING A REDUNDANT COMPASS DISPLAY FOR A MSRP $48.5K VEHICLE. I USED THIS DIC COMPASS DISPLAY IN UNFAMILIAR DRIVING AREAS FREQUENTLY. A MARKET FOCUS CUSTOMER SURVEY GROUP WOULD HAVE DISCLOSED THIS ISSUE. WE FILED A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT FORM WITH BUICK'S CAC CENTER. BUT, THE DEALER ADVISED ME THE CASE FILE WOULD BE SENT TO THE DEALER INSTEAD OF TO BUICK MARKETING/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT! THE ROOMINESS AND VALUE WERE THE MAIN REASONS FOR SELECTING THE ENCLAVE. MOUNTING AN AFTERMARKET COMPASS IN A LUXURY VEHICLE IS A POOR SOLUTION! *KB

8/18/2011

VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

PASSENGER SIDE FRONT WINDOW AND DOOR DEFECTIVE; SPORADIC AND RECURRENT NON-FUNCTION; DEALERSHIP WILL NOT REPAIR BECAUSE THEY CANNOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. SAFETY ISSUE; AS DRIVING AND UNABLE TO REACH PASSENGER SIDE, NOTICED DOOR UNLOCKED. DEALERSHIP SAID WOULD COST 800-900 DOLLARS TO REPLACE ELECTRICAL HARNESS AND WILL NOT REPLACE. *TR

4/6/2012

LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

PASSENGER SIDE FRONT WINDOW AND DOOR DEFECTIVE; SPORADIC AND RECURRENT NON-FUNCTION; DEALERSHIP WILL NOT REPAIR BECAUSE THEY CANNOT DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. SAFETY ISSUE; AS DRIVING AND UNABLE TO REACH PASSENGER SIDE, NOTICED DOOR UNLOCKED. DEALERSHIP SAID WOULD COST 800-900 DOLLARS TO REPLACE ELECTRICAL HARNESS AND WILL NOT REPLACE. *TR

4/6/2012

POWER TRAIN:AXLE ASSEMBLY

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH, THE STEERING WHEEL STARTED TO MAKE A SQUEAKY NOISE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING GEAR FAILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 62,000. UPDATED 08/19/14*LJ UPDATED 07/06/2017 *CT

6/12/2014

SEAT BELTS:FRONT:WARNING LIGHT/DEVICES

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO FRONT PASSENGER SEAT INDICATOR FOR THE "SERVICE AIR BAG" AND SEAT BELT WARNING INDICATOR LIGHT COMES ON FOR NO REASON. *SMD THE CONSUMER STATED THE WARNING INDICATORS SOUNDED, WHEN THERE WAS NO ONE SITTING IN THE PASSENGER SEAT. BEFORE THE CONSUMER COULD GET TO THE DEALER, THE INDICATORS WENT OUT ON THEIR OWN. *JB

6/25/2014

WHEELS

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

AT APPROXIMATELY 18000 MILES I NOTICED THAT MY MICHELIN TIRES HAD SMALL CRACKS IN THEM. SINCE THEY WERE NOT WORRISOME AT THAT TIME, I JUST DECIDED TO KEEP AN EYE ON MY TIRES, FOR BULGES OR LARGER CRACKS. I RECENTLY HAD MY TIRES REPLACED, LESS THAN 40000 MILES ON THEM BECAUSE I WAS GETTING READY TO GO ON A ROAD TRIP AND DIDN'T WANT TO TAKE THE CHANCE. MY TIRES WERE HEAVILY CRACKED AND ONE WAS LOSING AIR DAILY. I FIRST CONTACTED GM DIRECTLY (PRIOR TO REPLACING THE TIRES) TO SEE IF THEY WERE UNDER WARRANTY OR KNOWN DEFECTIVE/RECALL ITEMS. WHEN I SPOKE TO THE DEALER ABOUT THE TIRES BEING DEFECTIVE, THEY INSISTED THE TIRES WERE NOT DEFECTIVE, THAT MICHELIN ADDS SILICA TO THEIR TIRES IN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND THE SILICA ADDITION DOES NOT DO WELL IN HOT/DRY CLIMATES. THEY INDICATED THAT BECAUSE MICHELIN DOES ADD SILICA ON PURPOSE THE TIRES ARE NOT DEFECTIVE. MY ARGUMENT IS THAT THE TIRES ARE DEFECTIVE IF THEY DO NOT MAINTAIN THEIR INTEGRITY IN ALL CLIMATES. MY BUICK DEALERSHIP DID NOT HONOR THE BUICK WARRANTY. REF NHTSA ID NUMBER 10543165, AS I AM NOT THE ONLY CUSTOMER WITH THE PROBLEM AND TIRE INTEGRITY IS A VERY IMPORTANT SAFETY FEATURE ON VEHICLES. THIS NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED AND A RECALL ISSUED. I REPLACED MY TIRES WITH GOODYEAR TIRES AT JUST UNDER $900. ON A $50,000 CAR, HAVING TO REPLACE TIRES BEFORE 3 YEARS / 40,000 MILES IS UNACCEPTABLE. JUST IN CASE GM LOOKS AT THESE COMPLAINTS. YOU HAVE LOST A LOYAL CUSTOMER. I'VE BOUGHT 6 BRAND NEW GM CARS AND ONE SLIGHTLY USED GM CAR. HALF OF THOSE CARS HAVE HAD PROBLEMS, WHY I HAVE REMAINED A LOYAL CUSTOMER, WHO KNOWS... *TR

11/20/2014

STRUCTURE:BODY:TAILGATE

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE TAILGATE OF THE VEHICLE CLOSED INDEPENDENTLY. THE CONTACT SUSTAINED A HEAD INJURY THAT DID NOT REQUIRE MEDICAL ATTENTION. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER:15V415000 (STRUCTURE); HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 109,000.

10/20/2015

VISIBILITY:DEFROSTER/DEFOGGER/HVAC SYSTEM

1 Report0% of total

Previewing the first 1 complaint summaries.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 BUICK ENCLAVE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DEFROSTER FAILED TO FUNCTION. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 84,000. UPDATED 02/10/16*LJ *TR

12/8/2015

About This Data

Data and Methodology

MethodologyHow we score →

Scores are derived from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints, normalized by vehicle segment averages.

FAQ

What are the most common owner complaints for the 2011 Buick Enclave?

The most reported complaint category for the 2011 Buick Enclave is STEERING, with 41 owner reports. That is about 14% of all complaints logged here. Other recurring themes include STEERING, AIR BAGS, ENGINE.

Are complaints about the 2011 Buick Enclave a serious warning sign?

Potentially. 160 complaint reports fall into higher-attention systems such as brakes, steering, engine, powertrain, fuel, suspension, airbags, or electrical components. That does not prove every vehicle has a defect, but repeated complaints in those systems justify a more careful pre-purchase inspection.

How should buyers use complaint data for the 2011 Buick Enclave?

Use complaints as an early pattern to investigate, not a standalone verdict. Start with the top complaint categories, compare those themes against the recall report and maintenance guide, then inspect service records for evidence that the same problem areas were already addressed. If the same issue appears repeatedly across complaints and recalls, treat it as a real ownership-risk flag.

Are complaints about the 2011 Buick Enclave severe?

160 complaint reports involve higher-attention systems such as brakes, steering, engine, powertrain, fuel, suspension, airbags, or electrical components, which is enough to justify a focused inspection before purchase.

Complaint list entries are sourced from owner-submitted NHTSA ODI records.

Read complaint summaries

Buick Enclave: How should complaint data influence buying decisions?

Use complaint patterns together with recalls and maintenance guidance to estimate ownership risk and inspection priorities.

Carfocal links complaint data directly to recall and maintenance routes for the same model year.

Return to full vehicle report
Complaint entries
283
Top-topic view
5 grouped topics shown
Primary source
NHTSA ODI owner complaint records

We may earn a commission via links on this page.

In this guide

  1. 01Overview
  2. 02Common Problems
  3. 03Owner Complaints
  4. 04Data and Methodology

Start here

Buyer guideMaintenance guideRecall report

Get recall and ownership alerts for the 2011 Buick Enclave

Get our free model-year alerts and ownership updates.

Sign Up

We may earn a commission if you buy parts through our links. Learn more.

Carfocal

Automotive Research

Real data on vehicle reliability, safety, and ownership costs.

  • Used Car Research
  • Reliability Rankings
  • Buying Guides

  • Data Sources & Methodology
  • Editorial Standards
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclosures
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 Carfocal · All Rights Reserved