Specifications by model year
Compare the stats that matter
Every section below is populated from the available EPA, NHTSA, and vehicle-specification data for this model.
Fuel economy
EPA-rated city, highway, and combined economy by year. Values can describe one trim or drivetrain. A dash means unavailable data, not zero or absent equipment.
Engine, transmission & drivetrain
Powertrain specifications can vary between model years. Values can describe one trim or drivetrain. A dash means unavailable data, not zero or absent equipment.
| Year | Body style | Cylinders | Displacement | Fuel type | Engine code | Transmission | Drivetrain | Horsepower | Torque | Engine configuration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | — | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | — | — | — |
| 2015 | hatchback | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | — | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | — | — | — |
| 2014 | hatchback | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | — | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | — | — | — |
| 2013 | sedan | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | LEA-MF6 | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 130 hp | 140 lb-ft | Inline-4 |
| 2012 | coupe | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | — | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | — | — | — |
| 2011 | coupe | 4 | 1.5 | Regular | — | Manual 6-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 122 hp | 128 lb-ft | Inline-4 |
Pricing & configuration
Original pricing and model configuration where available. Values can describe one trim or drivetrain. A dash means unavailable data, not zero or absent equipment.
| Year | msrp | currency | Base MSRP | MSRP range | Confidence | notes | Source | estimatedAt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | currency: USD, Base MSRP: $19,975, MSRP range: $19,975 - $23,805, Confidence: 0.9, notes: Original MSRP for the 2013 model year., Source: AI-generated estimate; not a verified quote, estimatedAt: 6/6/2026 | USD | $19,975 | $19,975 - $23,805 | 0.9 | Original MSRP for the 2013 model year. | AI-generated estimate; not a verified quote | 6/6/2026 |
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | currency: USD, Base MSRP: $19,345, MSRP range: $19,345 - $23,355, Confidence: 0.9, notes: MSRP for various trims in 2011., Source: AI-generated estimate; not a verified quote, estimatedAt: 6/6/2026 | USD | $19,345 | $19,345 - $23,355 | 0.9 | MSRP for various trims in 2011. | AI-generated estimate; not a verified quote | 6/6/2026 |
Space, dimensions & utility
Seating, cargo, and physical configuration by model year. Values can describe one trim or drivetrain. A dash means unavailable data, not zero or absent equipment.
Safety ratings & driver assistance
NHTSA safety ratings and listed driver-assistance availability. Values can describe one trim or drivetrain. A dash means unavailable data, not zero or absent equipment.
| Year | Overall rating | Frontal crash | Side crash | Rollover | Rated vehicle | tpms | nhtsaSafetyRatings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2016 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD | standard | Overall rating: 4, Frontal crash: 4, Side crash: 3, Rollover: 5, Rated vehicle: 2016 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD |
| 2015 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2015 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD | standard | Overall rating: 4, Frontal crash: 4, Side crash: 3, Rollover: 5, Rated vehicle: 2015 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD |
| 2014 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2014 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD | standard | Overall rating: 4, Frontal crash: 4, Side crash: 3, Rollover: 5, Rated vehicle: 2014 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD |
| 2013 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2013 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD | standard | Overall rating: 4, Frontal crash: 4, Side crash: 3, Rollover: 5, Rated vehicle: 2013 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD |
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | standard | — |
| 2011 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2011 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD | standard | Overall rating: 3, Frontal crash: 3, Side crash: 3, Rollover: 5, Rated vehicle: 2011 Honda CR-Z 3 HB FWD |
Model year reports
2016
NewestThe 2016 Honda CR-Z presents an excellent reliability profile with zero recalls and zero complaints logged by NHTSA.
2015
The 2015 Honda CR-Z presents a mixed ownership proposition.
2014
The 2014 Honda CR-Z offers a unique blend of sporty styling and hybrid efficiency, earning a 'Good' reliability verdict.
2013
The 2013 Honda CR-Z offers a unique blend of sporty styling and hybrid efficiency, but its average reliability verdict and significant safety recall warrant careful inspection.
2012
The 2012 Honda CR-Z offers a unique, fuel-efficient package, but critical safety recalls related to the driver's frontal airbag inflator demand thorough inspection.
2011
The 2011 Honda CR-Z offers a unique, sporty driving experience with good fuel economy, but critical safety recalls for airbags and a high TSB count necessitate careful inspection.
Scores are derived from NHTSA recalls and owner complaints, normalized by vehicle segment averages.
What are the best years for the Honda CR-Z?
Carfocal currently has 6 published CR-Z reports, covering 2011 through 2016. Compare the year-specific reports directly to see how reliability, recalls, ownership costs, and value change over time. The newest published verdict says: The 2016 Honda CR-Z presents an excellent reliability profile with zero recalls and zero complaints logged by NHTSA.
Published year coverage: 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.
Is the Honda CR-Z reliable?
There is no single reliability answer for every Honda CR-Z. Carfocal's published year reports show why the model year matters, with verdicts that include the 2016 honda cr-z presents an excellent reliability profile with zero recalls and zero complaints logged by nhtsa. and the 2016 honda cr-z offers strong value for buyers prioritizing fuel efficiency and a clean reliability record. Compare the report for the year you are considering before you make a decision.
6 published year-specific reports are available for comparison.
What are common problems with the Honda CR-Z?
Across Carfocal's published CR-Z guides, recurring problem areas include Hybrid Battery, Accessory Drive Belt, and Brake Pads. The exact risk depends on the model year, so open the report for the vehicle you are evaluating to see which issues, recalls, and repair concerns apply.
Common problem areas found in published repair predictions: Hybrid Battery, Accessory Drive Belt, and Brake Pads.
Supporting data
- Published guides
- 6
- Years tracked
- 6
- Data sources
- NHTSA, EPA, owner complaints